Connecticut Republicans have no shortage of issues on which to challenge the Democratic majority. Rising costs, excessive state spending, housing mandates, public safety, and the erosion of local control should give the party ample reason to compete. Yet Democrats continue to dominate state governm ent, while Republicans struggle to turn public frustration into electoral success. Karen Fassuliotis It is time to ask why. Is the Republican State Central Committee, under Chairman Ben Proto, providing the leadership Connecticut Republicans need? An honest assessment suggests it is time for a change. Proto should step aside and allow State Central to select a new chairman with the vision, urgency, and organizational ability to rebuild the party. This is not about personalities. It is about performance and accountability. Having the right issues is not enough. Winning requires strong town committees, qualified candidates, sustained fundraising, effective voter outreach, and a clear message that reaches beyond election season. These are basic responsibilities of a statewide party organization. State Central has pointed to improvements in technology, voter data, communications, and relationships with local party leaders. Those efforts matter. But the question is not how many initiatives exist. It is whether they produce results. How many competitive districts have strong Republican candidates? Where are town committees too weak to recruit and support candidates? Are candidates identified early, trained, funded, and equipped to compete? Is there a coordinated communications strategy that gives Republicans a recognizable statewide voice? And where is the regular accounting of what works, what fails, and what must change? The party’s decision to leave certain heavily Democratic districts uncontested illustrates the need for a broader strategy. Proto has described this as a way to limit public campaign funds available to Democratic opponents, estimating that the decisions would prevent Democrats from receiving approximately $1.7 million. Under the Connecticut’s Citizens’ Election Program, an unopposed major-party candidate generally receives 30 percent of the applicable grant rather than the full grant available with qualifying major-party opposition. That is a legitimate financial calculation. But reducing an opponent’s grant is not the same as building a political party. Every district without a Republican candidate is also a district where Republicans surrender the opportunity to engage voters, develop future candidates, strengthen local organizations, and give residents a choice. A short-term financial tactic cannot substitute for competing throughout Connecticut. Republicans also need a serious plan to engage cities such as Hartford, Bridgeport, and Danbury. These communities should not be written off as permanently Democratic territory. Residents deserve an honest examination of the results of policies pursued by their elected officials, along with practical alternatives on education, employment, economic opportunity, housing, public safety, taxes, and municipal services. The challenges are substantial. U.S. Census Bureau estimates for 2020–2024 put poverty at 26.3 percent in Hartford, 21 percent in Bridgeport, and 11.7 percent in Danbury. These cities have different circumstances, and poverty cannot be attributed to one party or policy. But persistent economic hardship and unequal opportunity deserve scrutiny. Republicans should examine state policies and municipal decisions, identify where approaches have fallen short, and offer credible solutions. That means listening to residents, engaging community leaders, recruiting candidates who understand their cities, and remaining present between elections. A statewide party must compete statewide —not just in communities where it already has an established base. Connecticut needs a Republican governing agenda that speaks to the entire state, from its cities and smaller communities to its suburbs and rural towns. It must address residents’ practical concerns and explain how proposed policies would improve their lives. Criticism of Democratic leadership is not enough. Republicans must show voters what they would do differently and why it matters. State Central’s success should be measured by stronger local committees, qualified candidates, better-supported campaigns, and the ability to compete across Connecticut. The next chairman must present measurable goals for recruitment, grassroots development, fundraising, communications, and statewide outreach. A leadership transition will not solve every problem, but continuing with the same approach without a convincing accounting of results is not a strategy. The transition should be orderly, transparent, and based on leadership and ability —not factional loyalties. It is time for Ben Proto to step aside. Connecticut Republicans cannot afford another election cycle spent explaining why they were unprepared, why districts went uncontested, or why their message failed to reach voters. The work of rebuilding must begin now. The time for business as usual is over. Karen Fassuliotis lives in Greenwich. ...read more read less