By DEE-ANN DURBIN, Associated Press Kroger is denying Albertsons’ claims that it didn’t do enough to ensure regulatory approval of the companies’ planned supermarket merger. In court papers filed Tuesday in the Delaware Court of Chancery, Kroger said Albertsons disregarded the companies’ mer ger agreement and worked secretly with a partner, C&S Wholesalers, to try to force Kroger to divest more stores to C&S. Kroger also claimed that Albertsons was secretly planning to sue Kroger if the deal didn’t go through long before the merger actually fell apart in December. Kroger said in Tuesday’s court filing that it should not be forced to pay Albertsons a $600 million termination fee as well as billions of dollars in legal fees. In a statement Tuesday, Albertsons said it was Kroger that failed to honor the merger agreement. “Kroger’s self-interested conduct doomed the merger, and we are now focused on returning value to Albertsons’ shareholders to compensate for those losses,” Albertsons said. Related Articles Women’s NCAA Tournament not ready for expansion from competitive or financial standpoint Wildfires in North and South Carolina fueled by drought, wind and fallen trees from Hurricane Helene After Lahaina fire, Hawaii residents address their risk by becoming ‘Firewise’ A decadelong climate lawsuit saw plaintiffs grow from childhood to adulthood. Now, it’s over Fired federal workers face choices now that a judge wants them rehired Kroger and Albertsons first proposed the merger in 2022. They argued that combining would help them better compete with big retailers like Walmart and Costco. But the Federal Trade Commission and two states — Washington and Colorado — sued to block the merger last year, saying it would raise prices and lower workers’ wages by eliminating competition. It also said Kroger and Albertsons’ plan to divest 579 stores C&S Wholesalers was inadequate to ensure competition, since C&S was ill-equipped to take on so many stores. In December, judges in Washington and Oregon halted the merger in two rulings issued within hours of each other. Kroger said even after lower courts ruled, it believed the merger still had a chance of going through. Kroger said it told Albertsons it was planning to re-engage with the FTC after President Donald Trump’s election because it thought the FTC under Trump would be less hostile to mergers. But instead, Albertsons filed a lawsuit against Kroger the day after the lower court rulings. Albertsons said Kroger refused to divest more stores, even as it became clear that regulators weren’t satisfied with its plans. Albertsons said Kroger also should have sought other buyers beyond C&S to satisfy regulators’ concerns. ...read more read less