What is most important about Nov. 5? It is not whether Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, with tens of millions of ardent supporters, returns to the White House. It is not whether Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, with tens of millions of passionate followers, becomes the first female president of the United States. What is most important is that citizens turn out in record numbers voting for the candidate of their choice and respecting the right of other citizens to do the same without fear of harassment or belittlement. The greater the turnout, the greater the legitimacy of the outcome. Nothing is more deadly to democracy than an inert people. What is also important is defending, protecting and supporting volunteer poll workers doing their jobs with the selflessness of the Good Samaritan. What is further important is scrupulous respect for the legal processes in the various states for challenging votes and accepting, without question, final court decrees. What is additionally important is that Mr. Trump and Ms. Harris both exhort their adherents to honor the nation’s constitutional processes for the peaceful transfer of presidential power, period, with no commas, question marks or semicolons. In other words, we must make the most important victor on Nov. 5 the peaceful process of electing the president of the United States. If the process wins, all Americans win. We remain the gold standard in self-government for the entire world. Processes are the heart and soul of American greatness. The goal of the government in criminal prosecutions is not to win or lose a case but to see that justice is done. Mankind is made of crooked timber. To err is human. All institutions misfire from time to time. The phantasmagoric trial of O.J. Simpson for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman errantly ended in acquittals. But the jury verdicts were honored, and we stuck with the multiple procedural safeguards against convicting the innocent — the centerpiece of civilization. We should expect a very tight race between Trump and Harris. Legal challenges to vote totals in seven battleground states — Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Georgia — are likely. There is nothing suspect about seeking to prove electoral fraud in courts of law with admissible evidence and procedures to discover truth and discredit falsehood. After the 2020 presidential election, Mr. Trump or his campaign filed more than 60 suits alleging electoral fraud before judges covering the complete spectrum of partisan affiliation. In no case was legally admissible evidence of fraud forthcoming. Former Attorney General William Barr repeatedly informed Mr. Trump that his claims of electoral fraud were “bull—.” Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore in 2000 set the standard to which 2024 presidential candidates should repair. He peacefully accepted his loss to Republican candidate George W. Bush, occasioned by the controversial decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore, which awarded Florida’s electoral votes to Mr. Bush. Of course, judges may err. Courts are not infallible. But their final judgments must be scrupulously honored if the rule of law is to endure. Candidates or their supporters cannot be judges in their own cases and flout court decrees they dislike by force and violence. The United States will be undone if elections come to be determined by bullets rather than ballots. Related Articles Commentary | Crime debate misses key point: Police have more resources, but are solving fewer crimes Commentary | Donald Trump is not thoughtful enough to be a fascist Commentary | Newsom provides welfare to the wealthy, skimps on anti-homelessness programs Commentary | Presidential race closing argument: Kamala Harris trying to figure out hers Commentary | The 340B drug discount program is well-intentioned, but must be reformed JD Vance, Mr. Trump’s running mate, has stated, “We still, of course, believe in the peaceful transfer of power. We’re going to support the 2024 result.” But what about Mr. Trump himself? He has consistently refused to affirm Mr. Vance’s statement as if he were dodging bullets. He has declared on Truth Social that an allegation of massive electoral fraud “allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” even when constitutional processes have discredited the allegation. Mr. Trump needs to get on board. It would be wonderful for Trump, Vance, Harris and Tim Walz, Harris’ running mate, to issue a joint statement promising to honor the results of the 2024 election, including court decrees addressing legal challenges, and urging their supporters to do likewise. The same message should be heard in the home, in schools and in the pulpit. Let the old and the young, the rich and the poor, the men and the women, of all colors, ethnicities and nationalities, make oblations at the altar of the peaceful transfer of presidential power. That is our deliverance from political upheaval or convulsions. Armstrong Williams is manager/sole owner of Howard Stirk Holdings I & II Broadcast Television Stations and the 2016 Multicultural Media Broadcast owner of the year.