“Here” may be unlike any other film you have seen, a celebration of the life moments that can happen in one small spot on this great planet over time. The movie — in theaters this week — also is notable for being a reunion of key players from 1994’s beloved, Academy Award-winning “Forrest Gump,” with stars Tom Hanks and Robin Wright, filmmaker Robert Zemeckis and writer Eric Roth together again. Disappointingly, neither of those highly appealing aspects is reason enough to recommend “Here,” which, despite some strengths, feels like a missed opportunity. Based on Richard McGuire’s 2014 graphic novel of the same name — it an extention of his comic strip dating to the end of the 1980s — “Here” is a nonlinear, revolving series of vignettes. The film begins in prehistoric times, the story’s all-important spot in the future United States seeing large insects and giant dinosaurs. Then come meteors, ice, plant life, indigenous people and, eventually, Colonial types, who dig a foundation for a modest house, lay bricks and begin to raise walls. Tom Hanks and Robin Wright star in “Here.” (Courtesy of Sony Pictures) From there, we spend time with the men, women and children who will come to inhabit the home, located across from a much larger and historically significant house. They include its first occupants, John Harter (Gwilym Lee, “The Great”), who not long after the development of aviation has a passion for flying that terrifies his wife, Pauline (Michelle Dockery, “Downton Abbey”); Leo Beekman (David Fynn, “Undateable”), an inventor whose work leads to a well-known brand of reclining chairs, and his supportive better half, Stella (Ophelia Lovibond, “Elementary”); and a Black family — Devon Harris (Nicholas Pinnock, “For Life”), wife Helen (Nikki Amuka-Bird, “Rumours”) and son Justin (Cache Vanderpuye, “Invasion”) — that weathers the novel coronavirus pandemic in the domicile. (A scene in which Devon lays out in plain terms exactly how Justin will behave if he’s ever pulled over by a police officer is one of the film’s best, reminding us of what else was happening in this country only a few years ago.) Related Articles ‘Venom: The Last Dance’ review: Trilogy closer stronger than ‘Carnage’ at least ‘Conclave’ review: Papal drama both engrossing and sometimes hard-to-swallow ‘Smile 2’ review: Sequel builds on what worked in hit predecessor ‘Woman of the Hour’ review: Anna Kendrick’s directorial debut far from perfect ‘Disclaimer’ review: Thriller series from Cuarón, Blanchett seduces, frustrates For the majority of its life, however, the house is home to the Young family, starting with its purchase in 1945 by World War II veteran Al (Paul Bettany, “WandaVision”) and his wife, Rose (Kelly Reilly, “Yellowstone”). Their family will come to include son Richard, portrayed from the time he’s a young man by Hanks with the help of special effects. One day, Hanks brings home the woman with whom he will build a life in the house, Margaret (Wright, “House of Cards”), one that will include, for much of the time, his aging parents and a child of their own. As “Here” jumps around — among the Harters, Beekmans, the Harrises and others, including Benjamin Franklin (Keith Bartlett) and members of his family — the focus remains on the Youngs. Almost exclusively, Zemeckis and director of photography (and fellow “Gump” alum) Don Burgess leave the camera in one position, the space in the frame changed by production designer Ashley Lamont (“Star Wars: The Force Awakens”) via elements such as furniture and curtains. Mirrors that sit above a fireplace eventually will be replaced by a flatscreen TV. Co-written by Roth (“The Insider”) and Zemeckis, “Here” is like a play unrestricted by the time needed for set changes, the film zipping along at what at times is an almost-dizzying pace with the help of editor Jesse Goldsmith (Zemeckis’ “Welcome to Marwen”). Cleverly, he and Zemeckis use boxes within the frame to aid in — to preview, if you will — transitions in time. As a technical exercise, it’s all fairly interesting … but that’s about the best you can say about “Here.” It’s simply difficult to become all that invested in the characters who in this space will celebrate Christmases and Thanksgivings, make love, grow apart and even conduct a wedding and a funeral (many years apart). Margaret, portrayed by Robin Wright, and Tom Hanks’ Richard tie the knot in a scene from “Here.” (Courtesy of Sony Pictures) Sure, it’s enjoyable to see the dependable Hanks and Wright — Forrest and Jenny — together again, but, plainly, Richard and Margaret aren’t that compelling. It may be tempting to put some of the blame on all the de-aging effects done in the movie on Hanks and Wright, courtesy of VFX studio Metaphsic, but it’s convincing enough, and we’ve gotten pretty used to this kind of thing by now. Tom Hanks’ Richard and Robin Wright’s Margaret spend one of several Christmases together in a scene from “Here.” (Courtesy of Sony Pictures) Working for a fifth time with Hanks, following efforts that also include 2000’s “Cast Away” and 2022’s “Pinocchio,” Zemeckis infuses “Here” with an overly precious tone, as the talented director is often want to do. You can’t help but wonder if something more may have been made of the source material in another artist’s hands. Loosely, “Here” tells a story of a son following, frustratedly, in his father’s footsteps and of the stress that time and circumstances, especially those financial in nature, inflicts on couples who love each other. That’s all well and good, but any hope that the film is leading to something even approaching profound is dashed before the credits roll. ‘Here’ Where: Theaters. When: Nov. 1. Rated: PG-13 for thematic material, some suggestive material, brief strong language and smoking. Runtime: 1 hour, 44 minutes. Stars (of four): 2.