DELPHI Two witnesses took the stand on Thursday in Day 6 of the Delphi Murders Trial with testimony on the early stages of the case against Richard Allen. Allen is accused of killing Abby Williams and Libby German in 2017.Misfiled report brings Allen to forefrontThe first witness was Kathy Shank, a retired DCS worker and volunteer clerk who organized and evaluated around 14,000 tips that law enforcement received regarding the murders of Abby and Libby.Shank testified that she began helping in March of 2017 and had five filing cabinets of tips. In September of 2020, she was asked to scan those tips into a database. That process she said took two years.Shank said while moving locations, she found a box in a desk drawer that had a lead sheet from Feb. 16, 2017 regarding a "Richard Allen Whiteman.The report indicated Allen had been on the trail that day, but she said it also had CLEARED written on it. She testified, "I don't know how that tip ended up in that box."That's when she said she took that tip to Tony Liggett, lead investigator on the case.The tip was changed from Richard Allen Whiteman to Richard Allen on September 21, 2022.Allen self-reported that he had been on the trail the day the girls went missing. Shank said that tip was the only tip provided about him.During cross-examination Andrew Baldwin asked:"Did you ever see a tip about a guy walking down the road, bloody like he slaughtered a pig?" Shank answered, "Not that I know of."On re-direct Stacey Diener asked, "Would a roadblock tip be given to you?" Shank answered, "Didn't believe so."The jury then asked how Shank determined the name was incorrect for Allen. Shank said she was able to put it together based on her knowledge of the town and looking at the previous narrative.DNR officer is first to interview AllenThe second witness to testify was DNR Conservation Officer, Daniel Dulin. He was a lieutenant with ISP at the time of the murders and was involved with the command center. Dulin followed up on leads that police received.He held a lead sheet up in the air and explained to the jury what the sheet entailed."Name, contact, narrative, identifying number, who provided to, what officer should do," said Dulin.He said he picked up a lead sheet on Feb. 18, 2017 and made contact with Richard Allen by phone.He eventually requested to meet at Allen's house, but said Allen wanted to meet at a grocery store parking lot instead. At that time, he believed Allen was "Richard Allen Whiteman."Dulin testified that he and Allen met in a grocery store parking lot. Dulin claimed that Allen said he was at the trails on Feb. 13, 2017, from 1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Which changed from the time frame he allegedly gave earlier (1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.)Dulin testified that Allen said he parked at Farm Bureau parking lot and saw three girls on the trails. He said he parked at the old DCS office and walked towards the Monon High Bridge.Dulin said the encounter was "brief, about 5-10 minutes."He did not video or audio record the interview at the time. He said he then asked for Allen's phone information including the MEID number of the phone.Carroll County Prosecutor Nick McLeland asked:"When you spoke to Richard Allen, he told you he ran into three girls. Did he give you any information on what way the three girls were going?"Not that I know of," said Dulin.Dulin didn't follow up on the lead any longer and turned it back into the investigation center.In September of 2022, he received a call from Former Delphi Police Chief, Steve Mullin, asking if Dulin ever talked to Allen.Dulin said on stand, "Name didn't sound familiar to me but I went back to the computer and typed in Richard Allen, notes came up about an interview in Feb. of 2017."Mullin began to look more information up on Allen using a "Point of Sale System." That's where hunting license and other information goes.Mullin found Allen's phone number and fishing licenses for him and his wife. Those licenses included height, weight, DOB and changes made to his profile.Mullin said in April of 2017, there was a change to Allen's height from 5'4 to 5'6 on his fishing license and his weight dropped 15lbs."I just thought it was uncommon," said Dulin.At that point, Dulin was asked to point Allen out in the courtroom.During cross-examination, Rozzi asked how Allen contacted law enforcement.Dulin said, "I don't know how he contacted law enforcement. I just know he contact law enforcement."Regarding the change in the fishing license information, the defense asked if Dulin knew who put the new height and weight information into the fishing license program. Dulin responded "no."Rozzi said someone has to verify Allen's credit card information and that there are other previous height references on Allen's licenses as 5'6.Back to the scene Dulin said he also canvassed the crime scene numerous times throughout the investigation and during the first week. His first canvas was on Feb. 17, 2017.He testified to finding sticks and branches that caught his attention because they had blood on them and were piled around a 5-foot area.The crime scene had already been released.Dulin said he called the investigations center to go back out and collect the sticks.Unspent bullet The defense asked if Dulin immediately noticed deer stands in the woods, as to which Dulin responded "yes."The defense then questioned how uncommon it would be to find shell casings both spent and unspent.Dulin said: "It wouldn't be to find from a rifle, but not a handgun."Defense: "Is it unusual to see hunters and fishermen have handguns when they go out?" Dulin: "no sir."Defense: "Have you ever heard of Smith & Wesson?" Dulin: "Yes."On re-direct, the prosecution said Allen's credit card was used to purchase the new fishing licenses based on the IP address.One juror had a question regarding if Dulin could remember what Allen's hair was like when he first interviewed him. Dulin could not remember.Mullin continued by explaining his October of 2022 interview with Allen.He stated that Allen believed he was driving his Ford Focus, the same car he had in 2022. He may have gone through the country to get to the trail and if he was traveling through the country then he would've passed Harvest cameras.He also stated that Allen possibly drove West on 300 N.Allen said he was wearing blue jeans, blue or black Carhartt jacket, had a skullcap in his pocket, military style boots or tennis shoes.He said one woman appeared older, two appeared younger. When asked if investigators could see Allen's phone, Mullin testified that Allen originally agreed but changed his mind, got agitated and walked out.Dulin asked if the bridge guy was him.Mullin said Allen responded, "if the picture was the one that was taken on the girl's camera there's no way it could be me."Andrew Baldwin then began cross-examination.He said that no where in the transcript of Allen's interview did it say he may have driven west bound on 300 N.He then asked Mullin to find that portion in the transcript.The court sat quietly for 6 minutes waiting for an answer from Mullin. After 7 minutes went by, Mullin said, "that was my interpretation."Mullin told the jury he thought it was weird that Allen mentioned the picture on the girl's phone. Mullin was also asked if his theory contradicts Betsy Blair's testimony of seeing a 1965 Mercury.Jurors had three questions.One of those questions included: "Did you investigate how many black Ford Focuses in Carroll County?"Mulling responded: "No."Another juror asked: "Did you look to see if his other car was on video?"Mullin responded: "Yes, wasn't there."State witness #25 State witness number 25, Tony Liggett, was called. Liggett is the current Carroll County Sheriff.He was questioned by McLeland.In September of 2022, he reviewed the tip from Kathy Shank regarding Allen."It stuck out. I wasn't aware anyone had seen 3 girls on the trail that day. We believed it was "Bridge Guy," said Liggett.The jury then watched the video of "Bridge Guy" for a third time. This video was enhanced to stabilize the man and listen to what was being said. "Guys, down the hill."The family cried as the video played.Liggett said he found Allen owned a 2016 Ford Focus and 2006 Ford 500. Worked at CVSLiggett took pictures of Allen's car.He found it interesting that the vehicle was backed into the CVS parking lot, because the car was also backed into the DCS building lot.During Allen's timeline of events:He said he visited his mother that day, parked at the DCS lot, was on the trails from 12 p.m. - 1:30 p.m., passed three girls on the bridge, and said if he was going out of town he would normally drive his Ford Focus.Liggett believed Allen's interview of where he parked and the timeline was "wishy-washy."In the September of 2022, search warrant on Allen's house investigators found: .40 caliber handgun .40 caliber bullet in a keep safe box in the master bedroom blue Carhartt jacket gun in nightside that belonged to AllenDuring cross-examination, Baldwin questioned Liggett running for sheriff.He asked how much of a pay raise would he get, which Liggett responded $50,000.Baldwin also asked if an arrest would increase his chances of being elected.Liggett responded, "This had nothing to do with me. It had to do with two little girls."Liggett was also questioned about the integrity of the crime scene being compromised.Liggett said he knew at some point information of the crime scene was leaked.The defense also said no one saw Allen walking on surveillance video where the cars were parked.Liggett said he believed Allen acted alone in this case.The defense asked out of the hundreds of thousands of pieces of evidence, digital evidence, does any tie Richard Allen?"Liggett said, "No."