Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus wrote that Ginni Thomas, the spouse of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, has the right to pursue her own career (“Ginni Thomas one reason why SCOTUS needs an ethics code,” Star-Advertiser, Sept. 11). But Marcus does not practice what she preaches. She goes on to suggest Thomas should not be permitted to engage in advocacy related to reform of the Supreme Court, at least not without meeting disclosure requirements of her own.