OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA - MAY 20: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander #2 of the Oklahoma City Thunder drives around Stephon Castle #5 of the San Antonio Spurs during the first quarter in Game Two of the NBA Western Conference Finals at Paycom Center on May 20, 2026 in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. NOTE TO USER : User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Alex Slitz/Getty Images) | Getty Images Fraternizing with the Enemy, my series-long conversation with Cray Allred of the Daily Thunder, continues with the Spurs down 1-2 heading into a Sunday night matchup with a ton on the line. J.R.  After running out to a 15 point lead, the Spurs were outscored by 30 points in about 45 minutes. After the game there were a multitude of ideas tumbling through my head, and when I woke up I found that the tangle of thoughts had been kindly organized into several discrete easily numerated actions. So I decided to make a list.  J.R. Wilco’s Realistic Dos and Don’ts Do Prioritize Fox/Harper/Castle in PNRs with Wemby  Feed Wemby when he’s close to the hole Stay on the ground on SGA fakes Get the ball to Wemby on the move Don’t Leave guys alone on the three point line (unless you are Wemby, and it better not be Caruso)  Turn the ball over so much   Just stand around at the three point line  Forget what got you here  I call this list realistic because I’ve only chosen things that the team has already demonstrated that it can do against the Thunder. What do you think of the list and what is your reaction to Game 3? Cray That’s a pretty good list. I’m riding pretty high after that win, but I know that there are several of those correctable items that San Antonio coukd very well fix. After Game 2, I was prepared for an energy and momentum swing to boost the Spurs at home. It clearly did for those first five minutes, but I couldn’t believe it evaporated before the second quarter was finished.  I would guess a mixture of exhaustion, inexperience, and personnel are to blame for the Spurs falling apart after that 15-0 burst. Fox and Harper could get healthier. San Antonio can get Wemby moving to his most effective. And the home crowd+postseason desperation could  put the wind back in their sails.  What I am less sure of: whether more disciplined defense on Shai will actually slow him down. As he did in the first two rounds, he’s mastering the most aggressive and attentive defensive looks as the series goes on. San Antonio might lay off more and foul less, but that doesn’t mean he won’t punish them with more buckets. Give SGA an inch and he’ll take a mile, whether that’s room for his jumper, illegal limbs in his airspace, or freedom for his teammates. Do you think the rest of the series will be dictated more by the bench play, or more by Shai and Wemby? J.R. Sounds like you’re saying, “Exhaustion, inexperience and personnel issues: ladies and gentlemen, it’s your 2025-2026 San Antonio Spurs!” and I’m not even all that sure I can disagree — assuming that those personnel issues are referring to injuries. Amazing what taking on the defending champs can do to a team, isn’t it? And I’m sure you are riding high, I know I was during that 15-0 run. Isn’t it something how when a run extends like that it’s hard to imagine your team ever missing again, or the opponent ever making. And vice versa. It’s the same between games too. Right now, even a single win seems improbable, but that’s considering that only what has happened will happen. Since we don’t know what’s being cooked up, we’re left with supposition which leaves things murky. One thing is clear though, there’s no denying that adjustments are required.  As to your question, there are two options. Either San Antonio  finds a way to make Wemby’s minutes so productive that they can weather any run OKC makes when he rests (see above list), or the bench finds a way to hang with the Thunder in the non-Vic minutes. The odds may be stacked against both of those, but I’d say the first is the most likely.  What we’ve seen all year is Wembanyama experiencing obstacles before shifting tactics or adjusting mindset or coordinating with teammates, and then going on an epic run that rewrites history books and looks inevitable in hindsight. It’s happened in the micro (during the second half of games to come back from huge deficits) and in the macro (during the post-All Star Break when the team went 37-3 when Wemby played).  Here’s my question: how much of OKC’s bench play do you think is sustainable through an entire series?  Cray You teed up my favorite wonky Thunder question, which has been my hobby horse (or dead horse, maybe) all year: whether the role players can hold up throughout the most crucial postseason stretches. OKC has really underperformed on offense in both their 2024 2025 runs, particularly from behind the arc. Until now, they’ve been very good in the regular season, and very human during the playoffs–succeding despite shooting variability rather than because of it. This season has been their least reliant on three-point shooting as a contender, and I’ve wondered if they were leaning into the two-pointer by design or necessity this time around. My working theory: Shai’s midrange brilliance, and their stated premium placed on absolute shot quality over the three-pointer as the best option, has moved their floor and ceiling higher on offense. In past playoffs, the opposing defense could funnel more and more shots to Lu Dort and Josh Giddey. With the development of Jaylin Williams and the addition of Jared McCain, the Prince of OKC’s Disney Process, the range of players capable of getting hot when the ball is forced out of Shai’s hands has expanded significantly. So far, at least. I know that the Thunder role players will maintain elite effort and defense. For the first time in forever, I believe they will maintain their shooting. I can feel the Spurs fans getting bored, so I’ll move on. Now that we know Ajay Mitchell (out) and Jalen Williams (questionable, but very doubtful in my opinion) won’t be around for at least another game, OKC’s bench and starters are blending together. The reserves won’t be scoring 70+ points again, but they’ll at least keep the scoring advantage against the struggling Kornet and Keldon club. And to rejoin your other point: Wemby’s capacity to rewrite NBA history and basketball physics is the true x factor from here on out in my view. If I were you, I would love seeing Wemby and Mitch Johnson dismissing free throw fouling gripes after these losses to focus instead on what they can do better to get back to winning. NBC showed Wemby warming up with trainers pulling and grabbing him in the post–that’s the right stuff. If I thought Fox and Harper were really right, I’d pick SAS to easily even it up in Game 4. With the short rest and big minutes still necessary for the shortened Spurs rotation, I’m bracing for another game going down to the wire. I gotta stick with my pre-series pick of Thunder in 5 as long as it has legs, but I’m prepared to be wrong. What’s your pick? And has it changed from what you thought before the series? J.R.  As soon as you ask me for my prediction, I immediately think back to the 2012 Spurs versus Thunder Western Conference Finals when I traveled to Oklahoma City to stay with my sister’s family and cover the games. I was but a naïve editor-in-chief then, (only having taken over PtR in 2012) and had no idea of the heartbreak that was in store for me. San Antonio had won the first two games at home and there was no hint whatsoever of what was about to befall the Spurs.  They were dominated. For four straight games Oklahoma City showed that they were the superior team. They were more physical and they scored more easily than San Antonio. After being up 2-0, there was rarely a moment in the next four games where I felt comfortable that the Spurs had been able to figure out the new status quo of the series. I spent those four games trusting that Popovich would “figure it out.” After the series and over the next summer I realized that you can’t figure out a way to play differently than you have all season. There are wrinkles you can put in place and adjustments that can be made but playing style is something you prepare through the course of the season, and can’t be changed on the fly. These are the thoughts that I was thinking before the series when I realized that I simply couldn’t imagine San Antonio playing differently than they had when they won three games against a mostly-healthy Thunder team. But now that it’s obvious that the status quo of the series is not the same as it was in December, my prediction is entirely based on Game 4. Usually, it is the odd-numbered games that define a playoff series in the NBA, but I’m gonna know everything I need to know about the rest of the series in the first 12 minutes of Sunday night‘s game. If the Spurs have a different way to: a) handle the physicality, b) contain SGA without allowing role players to go off, and c) consistently create offense, then I believe the series can go to seven games and be up for grabs.  But if OKC has a sizable lead going into the second quarter, then I would expect the series to be over in five or six games. Forcing San Antonio to take the next step of their development over the off-season and the next couple years, just as the 2012 San Antonio Spurs had to. ...read more read less